More on how some of the rich get richer - and screw the rest.
Meet the Geniuses Who Lost Our Money
By Robert Kaiser
Sunday, August 9, 2009
FOOL'S GOLD
How the Bold Dream of a Small Tribe at J.P. Morgan Was Corrupted by Wall Street Greed and Unleashed a Catastrophe
By Gillian Tett
Free Press. 293 pp. $26
Ever wonder, looking at your 401(k) account statement, what exactly
happened last fall, when the financial system nearly collapsed and
trillions of dollars of "wealth" evaporated? Gillian Tett's splendid
book might be the explanatory tonic you've been looking for.
There are other good books that help untangle the disaster of 2008,
notably Mark Zandi's "Financial Shock" and Charles R. Morris's "The Two
Trillion Dollar Meltdown" -- both are accessible works by experts who
wrote for a general audience, but neither is as engaging as Tett's. A
writer for London's Financial Times, she brings an unusual credential to
financial journalism: a PhD in social anthropology. Anthropologists, as
Tett notes at the end of her book, look for holistic descriptions of
human cultures that "link different parts of a social structure." She
has done just that in "Fool's Gold," which illuminates a basic truth:
Apart from natural disasters, the great events that alter human history
are, however complicated, the work of human beings. In the end, economic
forces, the tides of history and such are just manifestations of human
foibles, often encouraged by dysfunctional cultures such as the one on
Wall Street.
Tett's mouthful of a subtitle implies that she found the tribe
responsible for this crisis. She does make a convincing case that a
small group of J.P. Morgan investment bankers, employees of the firm's
swaps department, were among the smartest and most creative proponents
of the new financial tool called derivatives, defined prophetically in
2003 by the investor Warren Buffett as "financial weapons of mass
destruction."
But if these bankers, mostly young and many with credentials in computer
science and mathematics, dreamed before others about the potential
power of derivatives, they were hardly alone, and they hardly deserve
the blame for what happened. They do, however, provide a rich cast of
characters and a storytelling device that helps make this book
compelling fun to read. And Tett, a resourceful reporter, got many of
them to open up.
There isn't room in a brief review to define the terms and acronyms of
the financial meltdown, but Tett does this well, partly with a glossary
at the back of the book. Better, she describes the evolution of the
derivatives called credit default swaps that contributed so much to last
fall's unpleasantness. The first of these worked out by J.P. Morgan
insured Exxon against the risk to its finances created by a threatened
fine of $5 billion for the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Blythe Masters, the
brilliant young woman who figured out how to do this, became a J.P.
Morgan star -- and very rich.
At first Morgan made the most hay from credit derivatives, briefly
dominating this new financial market. (Just how profitable it was Tett
doesn't say, a disappointing and unusual failing.) But the biggest money
ultimately was made from derivatives based on securitized home
mortgages, a category poisoned by subprime mortgages issued to U.S.
homebuyers with dubious credit ratings during the great housing bubble
in the middle of the decade. J.P. Morgan opted not to get into that
market, a very smart expression of a cautious corporate culture that
ultimately saved the company from the disasters others suffered.
Though Tett never lectures or hectors, her portrait of the way greed,
hubris and sheer stupidity combined to put global capitalism at risk of
disaster is devastating. Different readers will find their hair curled
by different revelations. Those most effective in raising my blood
pressure involved the bank executives who presided over the institutions
most prone to wretched excess but who knew little or nothing about the
derivatives their associates were buying and selling. "As the pace of
innovations heated up," Tett writes, "credit products were spinning off
into a cyber-world that eventually even the financiers struggled to
understand. The link between the final product and its underlying assets
was becoming so complex that it appeared increasingly tenuous. . . .
Most financiers lacked the cognitive skills to truly understand the
connections in this new world." Oh yes, and "even regulators seemed only
vaguely aware of what the banks were really doing."
My favorite quotation of the whole sordid story came from Charles
Prince, the hapless chief executive of Citigroup, one of the most
irresponsible banks. Prince said in the summer of 2007, "As long as the
music is still playing, we are still dancing" -- dancing, a year later,
right off a cliff.
Not everyone was so oblivious. Indeed, some banks, including Goldman
Sachs, shifted tactics in 2007 and began to bet heavily on a downturn in
the mortgage market, which soon followed. Timothy Geithner, then the
young head of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, now secretary of the
Treasury, presciently warned that the proliferation of new financial
gimmicks could have unforeseeable negative consequences, and
specifically noted the leverage -- borrowed money -- so freely used by
the big banks.
But the head of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, "the maestro," was
the leader of the camp of optimists who truly believed that the wonders
of the free market would dissipate the risks created by the new
financial tools. While the music still played, the ideology of
deregulation or just no regulation continued to prevail. Only later,
after "the whole intellectual edifice . . . collapsed," in Greenspan's
memorable phrase, did he and some of his allies (though far from all)
admit what he acknowledged so poignantly last October: The meltdown had
reduced him to a state of "shocked disbelief." "I made a mistake," said
the man who, when he ran the Fed, had the legal authority but not the
inclination to regulate the behavior by banks that led to the disaster.
Tett is an anthropologist, not a psychologist; she doesn't provide
satisfying explanations of the personal motivations of her principal
characters. Nor does she explain how rich they got, a frustrating
shortcoming. Greed is the permanent backdrop to her story; the
ridiculously luxurious lives of her principals are taken as simple
facts. She shortchanges the role of governments and officials such as
Greenspan. But these are all quibbles. She has written an irresistible
book.
robertgkaiser@yahoo.com
Robert G. Kaiser, associate editor of The Washington Post, is the
author of "So Damn Much Money: The Triumph of Lobbying and the
Corrosion of American Government."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080701894.html
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment