War on the Border
By TODD MILLER
THREE generations of Loews have worked the family’s 63 acres in Amado,
Ariz. In the last 20 years, the Loew family harvested thousands of
pounds of onions, garlic and pumpkins without incident. So Stewart Loew,
44, who was born and raised on the farm, was surprised when he went to
irrigate his fields one night and found himself surrounded by federal
agents.
Pointing to the fires about 200 feet away that Mr. Loew lit to keep warm
while he irrigated his fields, one of the agents slogged out of the
ankle deep water in the irrigation ditch and asked Mr. Loew what he was
doing.
“I’m irrigating, dude,” said Mr. Loew, who was in his pajamas. “What are you doing?”
“Don’t ‘dude’ me, I’m a federal officer,” the Border Patrol agent said, and demanded Mr. Loew’s identification.
Since Mr. Loew did not carry his wallet in his pajama pocket, the agents
followed him into his house; a local police officer, who knew the Loew
family, had already arrived, vouched for Mr. Loew’s identity and assured
the federal agents that Mr. Loew posed no threat to the homeland or
national security, and the agents left without comment or apology.
This kind of brush with law enforcement would have been unthinkable to
previous generations of farmers here. But these run-ins have become
increasingly common in the rugged, hilly desert stretch along the
southern borderlands where, in the post-9/11 world, everyone — even
farmers in pajamas — is a potential threat.
The United States-Mexico border has become a war zone. It is also a
transfer station for sophisticated American military technology and
weapons. As our country’s foreign wars have begun to wind down, defense
contractors look here, on the southern border, to make money.
Lately it has become entirely normal to look up into the Arizona sky and
to see Blackhawk helicopters and fixed-wing jets flying by. On a clear
day, you can sometimes hear Predator B drones buzzing over the Sonoran
border. These drones are equipped with the same kind of “man-hunting”
Vehicle and Dismount Exploitation Radar (Vader) that flew over the
Dashti Margo desert region in Afghanistan.
The Border Patrol is part of Customs and Border Protection,
now the federal government’s largest law-enforcement agency. Its
presence is a constant factor not only in the lives of Stewart Loew and
his neighbors, but also in the lives of those who live in places like
San Diego, El Paso, Brownsville, Tex., and other big cities along the
southern border that have sizable Latino populations.
The Border Patrol, however, concerns itself far less with
counterterrorism than with the agency’s traditional tasks of immigration
and drug enforcement. This creates an uneasy mixture of missions. And
it results in the deployment of an expensive military apparatus to
police and capture immigrants who cross the border in the hopes of
finding jobs as maids, janitors or day laborers.
In 2012, a majority of the more than 364,000 people arrested by Border
Patrol agents nationwide were migrant workers crossing the border.
Agents did not capture or arrest a single international terrorist.
But they have disrupted the lives of tens of thousands of people like
Stewart Loew who live and work near the border. There’s a point on
Interstate 19, two miles from the Loews’ farm, that buzzes with what
borderland residents call the “men in green,” who stop and interrogate
everyone who drives past. Border Patrol vehicles scan the off-road areas
smugglers and migrants use to circumvent official checkpoints. A mobile
control tower with a sophisticated surveillance system mounted on its
cabin is visible near the Loews’ farm.
The Department of Homeland Security, which includes Customs and Border
Protection, plans to invest billions more in borderland surveillance
towers, drones and helicopters if the House adopts the immigration
reform bill that the Senate passed in June. Even if it doesn’t pass,
there is more than $1 billion in the federal budget for surveillance
towers that will likely be clustered around the Arizona desert lands,
near Mr. Loew’s farm, where most undocumented migrants cross the border.
The Republican senators Bob Corker of Tennessee and John Hoeven of North
Dakota added a proposal to the immigration bill that would provide
about $40 billion in financing for extra agents and 700 miles of fencing
along the United States’ southern boundary, which Senator John McCain,
Republican of Arizona, noted would become “the most militarized border
since the fall of the Berlin Wall.” Indeed, if the Senate’s bill, the
Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act,
passes in the House, the Border Patrol will swell to 40,000 agents,
making it the size of a small army.
In recent years, we have built up our boundary and immigration policing
apparatus with great speed. Founded in 1924, the Border Patrol deployed
just over 4,000 agents in 1993. In only 20 years the agency’s ranks have
more than quintupled, and if the reform passes it will increase its
size tenfold.
The Border Patrol buildup in the aftermath of 9/11 was unparalleled. In
the 10-year period following 9/11, the United States spent a staggering
$90 billion on border enforcement.
In 2012, the Migration Policy Institute
reported that immigration and border enforcement spending totaled
almost $18 billion. That is 24 percent more than the $14.4 billion
combined budgets in the last fiscal year of the F.B.I., the Secret
Service, the Drug Enforcement Agency, the Marshals Service
and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Add the
billions anticipated in the Senate bill, and you have what the trade
publication Homeland Security Today calls a “treasure trove” for contractors in the border security industry.
Projected as an approximately $19 billion industry in 2013, defense
contractors seem, in the words of one representative from a small
surveillance technology company hoping to jump into the border security
market, to be “bringing the battlefield to the border.”
In 1999, the anthropologist Josiah Heyman wrote that the Southwest was
becoming a “militarized border society, where more and more people
either work for the watchers, or are watched by the state.”
There is nowhere else in the country with such extensive and
concentrated surveillance technology; nor is there any part of the
United States in which people are as clearly divided between the police
and the policed.
And the militarized security zone has begun to creep beyond the southern
border and to affect those who live near the northern border in places
like Spokane, Wash., Detroit and Erie, Pa., where the Border Patrol has
significantly increased its ranks.
IN the border zone — 100 miles from the boundary into the interior — the
Border Patrol’s authority extends beyond that of other law enforcement
agencies. For example, agents have the authority to conduct routine
searches at the border even in the absence of reasonable suspicion,
probable cause or a warrant.
“The problem with giving the largest federal law enforcement agency, and
one that operates with few if any accountability mechanisms, is that it
is a recipe for civil liberties abuses, and seriously risks further
erosion of Fourth Amendment rights,” says James Duff Lyall, a staff
attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona.
Mr. Lyall notes that the areas involved constitute a sizable portion of
the country; if you consider land and coastal borders, this 100-mile
zone encompasses approximately two-thirds of the United States
population.
Agents that operate in the 100-mile zone now regularly board buses and
trains and ask passengers for identification. They have — and use — the
authority to further question anyone who raises suspicions, especially
people who appear to be from another country.
In 2007, for example, a Border Patrol agent in Syracuse, N.Y., asked
Silvio Torres-Saillant, a professor of English at Syracuse University,
to produce his documents. When Mr. Torres-Saillant, a United States
citizen of Hispanic descent, gave the agent his university
identification, the agent demanded additional documents. At the Border
Patrol’s Rochester, N.Y., station, 2,743 people were arrested on buses,
trains and in stations from 2006 to 2009.
Border Patrol agents record the skin complexion of the people they
arrest, and most of those arrested were of “medium” complexion and from
Latin America, according to a 2011 report,
“Justice Derailed: What Raids on New York’s Trains and Buses Reveal
About Border Patrol’s Interior Enforcement Practices,” by the New York
University School of Law and the New York Civil Liberties Union.
In a much-publicized incident, Border Patrol agents stopped Senator
Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, 125 miles south of the border, in
New York. When Mr. Leahy asked what authority the agent had to detain
him, the agent pointed to his gun and said, “That’s all the authority I
need.”
The Immigration and Nationality Act gives Border Patrol agents even
greater authority when they operate within 25 miles of the international
border. Here agents “have access to private lands, but not dwellings,
for the purpose of patrolling the border to prevent the illegal entry of
aliens into the United States.”
Mr. Loew says agents don’t always comply with the 25-mile exemptions; he
points out that his farm in Amado is 30 miles from the border, and that
that did not stop agents from entering his property or from surrounding
him while he prepared to irrigate his fields.
Three years after Mr. Loew’s brush with federal agents, Border Patrol
agents held his 16-year-old son at gunpoint after they mistook the
minivan he was driving for another one. Mr. Loew says he wonders if the
agents were veterans, since so many Border Patrol recruits seem to be
ex-military men; in fact, almost one-third of all agents have served in
Iraq or Afghanistan. It’s no wonder that more and more people in the
100-mile zone from across the political spectrum view the Border Patrol
as an occupying army.
If immigration reform passes, it will mark another milestone in a
transformation that has already resulted in the creation of a
war-zone-like area in which agents enjoy special powers to chase down,
question and detain people.
Two oversight offices within the Department of Homeland Security have
already received hundreds of complaints of rights violations, including
beatings and Taser shootings, at the border. In the last three years,
Border Patrol agents have killed at least 15 people along the Southwest
border. Whether or not the immigration bill passes, the militarization
of the border and the disturbance it causes people like Stewart Loew
suggest it is time to look seriously into how we might better police the
agencies that police the border.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/opinion/sunday/war-on-the-border.html?hp&_r=0
No comments:
Post a Comment